A Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration from Moving to Fire 2 Transgender Air Force Members

FacebookXPinterestEmailEmailEmailShare
Transgender pride flag is displayed at a booth during Portland Pride
A transgender pride flag is displayed at a booth during Portland Pride on July 21, 2024, in Portland, Ore. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)

A federal judge on Monday agreed to temporarily block President Donald Trump's administration from initiating proceedings that could lead to the firing of two transgender men serving in the U.S. Air Force — the latest legal setback in the administration's push to implement sweeping changes in the military.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Christine P. O'Hearn came less than a week after the men — Master Sgt. Logan Ireland and Staff Sgt. Nicholas Bear Bade — sued to try to prevent their impending dismissal under Trump's executive order seeking to bar transgender people from serving in the military. They filed suit in New Jersey because Bade is stationed at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in Burlington County, and Ireland recently was stationed there for a training program.

O'Hearn's ruling also came just days after a federal judge in Washington separately said the military's proposed transgender ban was likely unconstitutional. That judge, Ana Reyes, has since barred the Defense Department from enacting a policy codifying the change; the government has challenged the ruling, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth saying on X: "We will win."

O'Hearn did not explain her ruling from the bench Monday, but during a 90-minute hearing, she asked pointed questions of Justice Department attorney Abhishek Kambli, including whether the government had collected any recent data or studies supporting its position that transgender troops are not fit to serve, and when or whether it believes judges can weigh in on policies relating to military staffing.

She also said it was clear to her that if the Air Force began holding hearings questioning the ability of Ireland and Bade to serve, they would be involuntarily removed due to the administration's clearly stated opposition to trans service members.

"How could the outcome of those proceedings be anything other than separation?" she asked. "We all know what the outcome is going to be."

Her ruling technically blocks the Air Force from moving to begin the administrative process of dismissing Ireland and Bade for 14 days. But their lawyers argued the timing was crucial — dismissal proceedings could have otherwise started this week, they said in court documents.

And O'Hearn's decision should allow the men to remain in service as the broader challenge to the Trump administration's policy proceeds in Washington, D.C. — something that could bar the administration from implementing its ban altogether.

The men's attorney, Jennifer Levi, said afterward that she appreciated that O'Hearn understood the gravity of the case, and said: "My clients are very relieved to have this order issued."

Bade, who attended the hearing, declined to comment afterward, as did Kambli, the government's attorney.

Ireland, 37, and Bade, 44, filed suit last week, saying that after Trump signed an executive order in January seeking to ban transgender military service, they were quickly forced into administrative absence and told they could continue to serve only if they did so as women. Both Ireland and Bade have medically transitioned to live as men — Ireland about a decade ago, while serving in the Air Force, and Bade before he enlisted.

The men said they were also forced to involuntarily return to their home bases for failing to comply with "female regulations and standards." Ireland, who had been at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, was sent to Hawaii, their suit said, while Bade, who had been deployed to Kuwait, was forced to return to New Jersey.

Ireland, who had completed tours of duty in Afghanistan, South Korea, and the United Arab Emirates, was also suddenly denied acceptance to Officer Training School this month, his suit said, even though he'd previously received his commander's top endorsement for the program.

They said in their suit that efforts to have them involuntarily removed from duty would violate their Fifth Amendment equal protection rights.

And even though the judge in Washington, D.C., subsequently issued a broader order prohibiting the transgender ban from being enacted, their lawyers said it was still important for O'Hearn to rule on the more narrow issue related to their cases alone.

The Trump administration has been making frequent and abrupt changes to a variety of its policies, the lawyers said, and the state of the proposed transgender ban "is far from settled."

_____

© 2025 The Philadelphia Inquirer. Visit www.inquirer.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Story Continues